brag

Gay marriage approval

Rate this Entry

5 Comments

brag

, 02-21-2010 at 01:22 PM (749 Views)

Originally Posted by brag

Being born homosexual, heterosexual, bisexual and asexual is not a choice, and no one should be derogated for their sexual orientation. Reincarnation involves a transmigration of the soul which has no gender, but baggage in its vortex.

Only in the sense of choosing one's own parents that reincarnation does involve a choice, and only a choice of parents and conditions under which old issues surrounding the soul can be resolved. The soul or Atma cannot move on to fulfil its return to oneness with the Paramatma when it still has baggage, including that of sexuality in its vortex.

The word marriage is not to be confused with homosexual unions. Another word to identify homosexual unions as another kind of marriage must to be created. Both concepts are not the same. One is intended as a means for procreation with a life-long partnership as duty in promoting harmony and experiencing oneness between individuals. The other is intended for life-long, same-sex companionship also as a union for promoting and experiencing oneness between individuals. There is no accident in life with the Creator as the cause of all.

Tags: None

Categories: ‎ Uncategorized

Email Blog Entry

« Lokas And Planets: Planets or States of Consciousness Within Planet Earth Main Gay Marriage »

Comments

Angie - 02-21-2010 02:03 PM
Brag, when it comes to us human beings, God does not cause anything to happen, He allows it to happen, and whether or not you choose to be this .. throughout the Bible God gave man and woman the ability and freedom to CHOOSE.

Except in the case of hemaphrodites [even they can CHOOSE which organ they prefer] He has clearly defined the sexual organs in male and female as a "fit" for each other. But it is up to us to CHOOSE between satisfying the lusts of the flesh or using our sexual organs for that which it is intended.

The only intent for the anus is to flush out the filth the body rejects in solid form and the eurethra to flush out in liquid form.
brag - 02-21-2010 07:26 PM
How can I disagee with another point of view, but simply say that millions have similar and opposing views. All expressions are driven by the Totality of Love according to person, place and time.
onekaq - 03-01-2010 11:35 AM
If you have urges for man it is fine! but why does it have to involve a sexual act as well? Cant you live with a guy and not have that sort of contact with them?
greall - 04-19-2010 05:48 AM
Originally Posted by onekaq

If you have urges for man it is fine! but why does it have to involve a sexual act as well? Cant you live with a guy and not have that sort of contact with them?

Hmmm...so you'd have urges for your wife and not have any sexual contact with her...

I think that that's a bit facetious...

Greg
letric - 04-24-2010 08:48 AM
Homosexual inclinations are not often a matter of choice for
the individual. Occasionally they may be, but this is the exception
rather than the rule. In general it is, I am convinced, and involuntary
deviation. But according to most medical opinion - I know that
there are some differences about this - It is not a disease in the sense
of being, the majority of cases, subject to medical treatment.
It is more in the nature of a disability than a disease and, of course,
it is a grave disability for the individual. It leads to a great deal of
loneliness and unhappiness and to a heavy weight of guilt and shame.
The question which we have to answer is whether, in addition, the
disability, provided it involves no corruption of minors and no
public indecency, should remain subject to the rigours of criminal
law. Do we swerve any useful proper public purpose by keeping it
so?

Roy Jenkins, Labour Home Secretary (1920 - 2003)
gave the Sexual Offences Bill his full support, arguing
that the stigma surrounding homosexuality was a direct
consequence of its criminalisation,.